thekb
Apr 16, 12:20 PM
I found one for the 4G ipod ... would that work?
rainman::|:|
Jul 25, 09:03 PM
could you possibly be more specific? what is it telling you? why can't you install your copy? Is it the original copy that came with the iMac??
pnw
pnw
RealSkyDiver
Jun 23, 05:13 PM
Yep, 10am in California as well but things always change in the last minute. I planned my waiting time with these 3 additional hours so I have no problem with it.
topgunn
Jun 30, 10:16 AM
Sorry, but at this time I am going to limit myself to buyers in the US.
flopticalcube
Apr 25, 09:07 PM
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1107457
xbuddycorex
May 3, 06:17 AM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)
I honestly don't think there's a faster way.
I honestly don't think there's a faster way.
Hisdem
Feb 8, 02:28 PM
Wait, so they can use their phone in space, but mine has to be put away on the plane? Pissed. Lol.
This.
This.
XxpikachuxX
Mar 27, 05:36 PM
Dude , relax with that attiude ur not helping, the guys that do the jailbreak do it for free, and ur demanding something free like u own it or something, it would come i do time relax or you can figure out ur own jailbreak ;)
Sent from iPad 2
Sent from iPad 2
MaxBurn
May 2, 05:39 PM
Seperate login for the computer. I haven't looked but I dont know if you can do a second account inside itunes.
spicyapple
Nov 6, 07:40 PM
That's hot. :cool:
Oh, wait... are you zipping it up?
Oh, wait... are you zipping it up?
AdrianK
May 2, 06:36 AM
Optical media doesn't last forever. You're going to need to obtain new discs, assuming the issues is with the discs and not the drive. Do you have issues with any other CDs/DVDs?
srharris22
May 3, 06:28 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_7 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E303 Safari/6533.18.5)
Thanks, I even looked in craigslist and could not find anything. I think I have a contact now but will look around on linkedin and Facebook next. Was hoping I might get a hit on here, we will see I guess.
Thanks, I even looked in craigslist and could not find anything. I think I have a contact now but will look around on linkedin and Facebook next. Was hoping I might get a hit on here, we will see I guess.
D1G1T4L
Apr 2, 09:02 AM
Yup it is true :rolleyes:
Marky_Mark
Dec 4, 02:26 AM
By the way, I also tried the griffin ear jams as a cheap alternative, before I bought the Sonys, and IMO they were uncomfortable, bulky, sharp on your ears, and made everything sound rather muffled. It's a nice idea, poorly executed. I wouldn't recommend them, unfortunately. :(
However, the good thing is that if you get some, the silicone plugs are compatable with the Sonys, so you get to have some spares!
However, the good thing is that if you get some, the silicone plugs are compatable with the Sonys, so you get to have some spares!
Eidorian
Dec 6, 05:50 PM
Ok I'm a complete noob....what is altivec?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AltiVec
http://developer.apple.com/hardware/ve/
http://developer.apple.com/hardware/ve/
Huntn
Feb 28, 07:56 AM
In 1961, 50 years ago, President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Republican and man who was deeply involved in the favorable outcome of WWII warned the Nation of the rise of the "Military-Industrial Complex" in his farewell address.
This is a fantastic article, The Tyranny of Defense, Inc (http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/01/the-tyranny-of-defense-inc/8342/), if you would like something to ponder about the history of the U.S.. No, it was not all our fault. The Soviet Union was there egging us on in the beginning. But today the War Machine is alive and well. The cost of the Iraq/Afganistan war is at least $1 Trillion. Some observes believe the cost could reach 2 or 3 trillion dollars. Should we bankrupt ourselves for the benefit of big business? By defeating Iraq and struggling in Afganistan have we increased our security in the big scheme of things as compared to the stress on our economy? I'm doubtful.
Largely overlooked by most commentators was a second theme that Eisenhower had woven into his text. The essence of this theme was simplicity itself: spending on arms and armies is inherently undesirable. Even when seemingly necessary, it constitutes a misappropriation of scarce resources. By diverting social capital from productive to destructive purposes, war and the preparation for war deplete, rather than enhance, a nation’s strength. And while assertions of military necessity might camouflage the costs entailed, they can never negate them altogether.
“Every gun that is made,” Eisenhower told his listeners, “every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.” Any nation that pours its treasure into the purchase of armaments is spending more than mere money. “It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.” To emphasize the point, Eisenhower offered specifics:
The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities … We pay for a single fighter with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.
When President Obama was first elected he asked his generals what are his options in Afghanistan. He was only given one choice, the surge. According to Bob Woodward, Obama complained, "What's my options? You've only given me one option."
The article's conclusion is that funding the Military-Industrial Complex does not benefit average Americans, in fact hurts them. I'll add that the MIC has the full backing of the Republican Party.
Furthermore, military Keynesianism has proved to be a bust. In contrast to the 1950s, military extravagance is depleting rather than adding to the nation’s wealth. In the Eisenhower era, the United States, a creditor nation, produced at home the essentials defining the American way of life—everything from oil to cars to televisions. Today, we import far more than we export, with ever-increasing debt as one result. Furthermore, in the 1950s, we were mostly at peace; today we are mostly at war—and, as a result, more of the resources provided to the military go abroad and stay there.
the grandchildren of Ozzie and Harriet, coping with 9.8 percent unemployment and contemplating the implications of trillion-dollar deficits, see little benefit from our exorbitant Pentagon outlays. If paying Pashtun drivers to truck fuel from Pakistan into Afghanistan is producing any positive economic side effects, the American worker is not among the beneficiaries.
This is a fantastic article, The Tyranny of Defense, Inc (http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/01/the-tyranny-of-defense-inc/8342/), if you would like something to ponder about the history of the U.S.. No, it was not all our fault. The Soviet Union was there egging us on in the beginning. But today the War Machine is alive and well. The cost of the Iraq/Afganistan war is at least $1 Trillion. Some observes believe the cost could reach 2 or 3 trillion dollars. Should we bankrupt ourselves for the benefit of big business? By defeating Iraq and struggling in Afganistan have we increased our security in the big scheme of things as compared to the stress on our economy? I'm doubtful.
Largely overlooked by most commentators was a second theme that Eisenhower had woven into his text. The essence of this theme was simplicity itself: spending on arms and armies is inherently undesirable. Even when seemingly necessary, it constitutes a misappropriation of scarce resources. By diverting social capital from productive to destructive purposes, war and the preparation for war deplete, rather than enhance, a nation’s strength. And while assertions of military necessity might camouflage the costs entailed, they can never negate them altogether.
“Every gun that is made,” Eisenhower told his listeners, “every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.” Any nation that pours its treasure into the purchase of armaments is spending more than mere money. “It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.” To emphasize the point, Eisenhower offered specifics:
The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities … We pay for a single fighter with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.
When President Obama was first elected he asked his generals what are his options in Afghanistan. He was only given one choice, the surge. According to Bob Woodward, Obama complained, "What's my options? You've only given me one option."
The article's conclusion is that funding the Military-Industrial Complex does not benefit average Americans, in fact hurts them. I'll add that the MIC has the full backing of the Republican Party.
Furthermore, military Keynesianism has proved to be a bust. In contrast to the 1950s, military extravagance is depleting rather than adding to the nation’s wealth. In the Eisenhower era, the United States, a creditor nation, produced at home the essentials defining the American way of life—everything from oil to cars to televisions. Today, we import far more than we export, with ever-increasing debt as one result. Furthermore, in the 1950s, we were mostly at peace; today we are mostly at war—and, as a result, more of the resources provided to the military go abroad and stay there.
the grandchildren of Ozzie and Harriet, coping with 9.8 percent unemployment and contemplating the implications of trillion-dollar deficits, see little benefit from our exorbitant Pentagon outlays. If paying Pashtun drivers to truck fuel from Pakistan into Afghanistan is producing any positive economic side effects, the American worker is not among the beneficiaries.
Mal
Apr 29, 10:54 PM
First thing to try is to delete ~/Library/com.apple.Dock.plist (~ denotes your user folder, in case you're not familiar with the notation), and then restart. That will recreate that file with the default contents. If that doesn't work, you'll have to do a reinstall probably, unless you saved the original Dock.app files (which is always recommended, even when using CandyBar or similar apps). If you use Time Machine, then you can get it from there, assuming you didn't intentionally exclude System Files.
jW
jW
blevins321
May 1, 11:26 PM
Try this: (courtesy of Yahoo Answers lol)
Open AirPort Utility and click on Manual Setup
Click the Base Station tab below the icons to name your Time Capsule, establish a device password (write this down) and adjust Time Zone settings
Click the Wireless tab
Wireless Mode = Join a wireless network. Hold down the option key on your Mac if you don't see this choice.
Wireless Network Name...the name of the available wireless network should appear as a choice to join if the Time Capsule is receiving a good signal at its current location. Click the select it or type in the name of the network
Wireless Security = <whatever your network is using>
Click Update at the lower right and the Time Capsule will restart in 20-25 seconds. If you get the green light, you should be all set.
Open AirPort Utility and click on Manual Setup
Click the Base Station tab below the icons to name your Time Capsule, establish a device password (write this down) and adjust Time Zone settings
Click the Wireless tab
Wireless Mode = Join a wireless network. Hold down the option key on your Mac if you don't see this choice.
Wireless Network Name...the name of the available wireless network should appear as a choice to join if the Time Capsule is receiving a good signal at its current location. Click the select it or type in the name of the network
Wireless Security = <whatever your network is using>
Click Update at the lower right and the Time Capsule will restart in 20-25 seconds. If you get the green light, you should be all set.
cpnotebook80
Apr 20, 10:30 PM
I did change footage to 24fps but after rendering the clip seemed slow mowed and it was weird
not sure if that was the intent?
not sure if that was the intent?
callmemike20
May 6, 03:36 PM
I never do when changing channels, they're never substantially different, but yeah, ads are bitch.
It's never a huge difference, but it's noticeable.
I think the biggest problem is music in TV shows. It's always louder than everything else.
It's never a huge difference, but it's noticeable.
I think the biggest problem is music in TV shows. It's always louder than everything else.
gnasher729
Apr 19, 04:48 AM
Thanks for reply . It is obviously visible that the complaint is about 10.4 sdk
I was bit surprized by the error message having reference to 10.4 sdk but all the frameworks belong to to absolute path "/System/Library/Frameworks/***.framework"
(by clicking get Info button on individual frameworks)
So find the source file giving the error, Preprocess, and check where and why it includes that header file.
And System frameworks should have Path Type = Relative to current SDK.
I was bit surprized by the error message having reference to 10.4 sdk but all the frameworks belong to to absolute path "/System/Library/Frameworks/***.framework"
(by clicking get Info button on individual frameworks)
So find the source file giving the error, Preprocess, and check where and why it includes that header file.
And System frameworks should have Path Type = Relative to current SDK.
blueroom
Apr 22, 07:32 PM
Take it to a qualified repair shop before you do any more damage.
h00ligan
Apr 11, 11:36 PM
Hey all, before I buy even more 'expensive' accessories..I wonder if anyone has had something like the hhi leather skin, or an alternative to the bumper (not interested if it doesn't have buttons or great button access). I'm also thnking of going ag on the iPhone, but won't pay powersupport's outrageous prices (IMO).
I had a cheap eBay case that I actually really like..split two pieces, slightly rubberized, split around the side to put it on...and it did it's job, when my mother's husband chunked my phone about 4.5 ft on to tile..the case split and absorbed the shock...but it cracked.
I'd buy another..but I can't freaking find it again!
So...thinking of another route...and in the meantime, I'll check my posting history here for the last case link!
I had a cheap eBay case that I actually really like..split two pieces, slightly rubberized, split around the side to put it on...and it did it's job, when my mother's husband chunked my phone about 4.5 ft on to tile..the case split and absorbed the shock...but it cracked.
I'd buy another..but I can't freaking find it again!
So...thinking of another route...and in the meantime, I'll check my posting history here for the last case link!
jeff9238
May 4, 01:47 PM
thank for helping me so much dude..its work for me...